Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Mont. 343 - Doting v. Trunk

Doting v. Trunk’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Steer, Inc. v. Department of Revenue · Zavarelli v. Might · Wilmington Parking Authority v. Burton · State Board of Equalization v. Fall · Nicholes v. Hunt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no express provision in [the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA)] which establishes liquidation by sale as the exclusive mode of distributing partnership assets after dissolution.”); see also Logoluso v. Logoluso, 233 Cal.App.2d 523 , 43 Cal.Rptr. 678, 682 (1965) (holding that court has authority to distribute partnership property in kind); Swann v. Mitchell, 435 So.2d 797, 800 (Fla.1983) (stating that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen this Court states in an opinion a principle or rule of law necessary to the decision, such statement becomes the law of the case and controls throughout its subsequent progress, both in the trial court and upon subsequent appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.