Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 N.C. 306 - Perry v. Jolly

Perry v. Jolly’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2016

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

60196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission · DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works Commission · Wilson v. . Ervin · Woolard v. Smith · Dellinger v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) The sale does not destroy or separate the interests of the tenants by the entirety if one of the parties is incompetent. The right of survivorship is transferred to the fund. A divorce will convert tenancy by entirety into a tenancy in common. A voluntary sale will work a conversion of the land into personalty to be held as other personalty. Wilson v. Ervin, 227 N.C. 396 , 42 S.E. 2d 468 . However to be voluntary, the sale must be made by both husband and wife. Both must be sui juris. If one is incompetent, a sale cannot be the voluntary act of both. When the court finds it necessary for the good of the parties to require a sale, it is necessary that a good title pass to the purchaser. However, the right of survivorship is transferred to the fund to be held in the manner hereinafter discussed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.