259 N.C. App. 374 - State v. Locklear’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lawrence · Stenberg v. Carhart · Howe v. Richardson · Martell v. United States · Bussell v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, that an insurance policy existed between Peter Dane Koke and National General Insurance Company; second, that the defendant presented a written statement in support of a claim for payment pursuant to that insurance policy; third, that the statement contained false or misleading information concerning a fact or matter material to the Claim. Fourth, that the defendant knew the statement contained false or misleading information concerning a fact or matter material to the claim; and fifth, that the defendant acted with the intent to defraud National General Insurance Company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]here there is evidence of various misrepresentations which the jury could have considered in reaching a verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.