259 N.C. App. 499 - Kaiser v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 168 N.C. App. 283 - Spicer v. Spicer · 126 N.C. App. 362 - Ellis v. Ellis · 152 N.C. App. 438 - Leary v. Leary · 177 N.C. App. 642 - Diehl v. Diehl · 29 N.C. App. 124 - Holt v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What matters in these circumstances is the reason why the trial court examines past income; the court's findings must show that the court used this evidence to accurately assess current monthly gross income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[i]t is well established that child support obligations are ordinarily determined by a party's actual income at the time the order is made or modified.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'a trial court may permissibly utilize a parent's income from prior years to calculate the parent's gross monthly income for child support purposes.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.