Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 N.C. App. 810 - In re: J.A.M.

259 N.C. App. 810 - In re: J.A.M.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Troxel v. Granville · 112 N.C. App. 747 - Matter of Safriet · 135 N.C. App. 387 - In Re McLean · In Re Stumbo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any juvenile less than 18 years of age (i) who is found to be a minor victim of human trafficking under G.S. 14-43.15 or (ii) whose parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker does not provide proper care, supervision, or discipline; or who has been abandoned; or who is not provided necessary medical care; or who is not provided necessary remedial care; or who lives in an environment injurious to the juvenile's welfare ; or the custody of whom has been unlawfully transferred under G.S. 14-321.2 ; or who has been placed for care or adoption in violation of law. In determining whether a juvenile is a neglected juvenile, it is relevant whether that juvenile lives in a home where another juvenile has died as a result of suspected abuse or neglect or lives in a home where another juvenile has been subjected to abuse or neglect by an adult who regularly lives in the home.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(1) continued to fail to acknowledge her role in her rights being terminated to her six other children, (2) denied the need for any services for J.A.M.'s case, and (3) became involved with the father, who [had] engaged in domestic violence ... even though domestic violence was one of the reasons her children were removed from her home, constitute evidence that the trial court could find was predictive of future neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the trial court's order contains no findings of fact [ ] which are supported by any evidence, and certainly * not 'clear and convincing competent evidence,' that J.A.M. is presently at substantial risk of neglect by Respondent-mother.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.