Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Neb. 198 - Jack v. Clinton

Jack v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Vogel v. Vogel (2002), McLaughlin v. McLaughlin (2002)

30 state decisions

230200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kalkowski v. Kalkowski · Gerber v. Gerber · Farnsworth v. Farnsworth · Jafari v. Jafari · Evenson v. Evenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The grant of temporary permission to remove children to another jurisdiction complicates matters and makes more problematic the subsequent ruling on permanent removal and encumbers appellate evaluation of the ultimate decision on permanent removal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “discourage[d] trial courts from granting temporary permission to remove children to another jurisdiction prior to a ruling on permanent removal and instead encourage[d] them to promptly conduct a full hearing on permanent removal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As a result of the grant of temporary removal, consideration of [the temporary removal period] with respect to the legitimacy of the permanent move and the best interests of the children was unavoidable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.