Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Neb. 750 - McLain v. Ortmeier

McLain v. Ortmeier’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

45 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Doe v. Zedek · Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co. · Farmers and Merchants Bank v. Grams · Lackman v. Rousselle · Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory order, not a final order, and therefore not appealable.... The denial of a summary judgment motion is neither appealable nor reviewable. Whether a denial of summary judgment should have been granted generally becomes moot after a full trial on the merits____The overruling of a motion for summary judgment does not decide any issue of fact or proposition of law affecting the subject matter of the litigation, but merely indicates that the court was not convinced by the record that there was not a genuine issue as to any material fact or that the party offering the motion was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law----After trial, the merits should be judged in relation to the fully developed record, not whether a different judgment may have been warranted on the record at summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.