State v. Tidwell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “determination whether joinder of charges substantially prejudices a defendant must be based on a case-specific analysis of the charges and the facts alleged to support them.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 363 - State v. Schmidt

2. “mere assertion that evidence relating to some charges will influence the jury's consideration of other charges is insufficient”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 363 - State v. Schmidt

3. “is sufficiently simple and distinct to mitigate the dangers created by joinder”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 363 - State v. Schmidt