Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 ORAPP 441 - State v. Dorsey

State v. Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any offense with respect to which the defendant is convicted or any other criminal conduct admitted by the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The plain import of ORS 137.106 is that, when a person is convicted of a crime, the trial court may impose restitution for damages recoverable in a civil action arising out of the facts or events constituting that crime or any other criminal conduct admitted by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a defendant 'cannot be required to pay restitution for [economic] damages arising out of criminal activity for which he was not convicted or which he did not admit having committed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.