Guirma v. O'Brien’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“knows or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should know that there is a substantial possibility that (1) he or she has suffered harm, (2) the harm was caused by the lawyer's acts or omissions and, (3) the lawyer's acts or omissions were tortious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the only conclusion that a reasonable trier of fact could reach is that the plaintiff knew or should have known the critical facts at a specified time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the pleading shows that the action has not been commenced within the time limited by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.