People v. Klinck’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. United States · Colorado v. Connelly · Mincey v. Arizona · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoting California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121, 1125 , 103 S.Ct. 3517 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1275 (1983) (per curiam). Some of the factors a court should consider include: (1) the time, place, and purpose of the encounter; (2) the persons present during the interrogation; (8) the words spoken by the officer to the defendant; (4) the officer's tone of voice and general demeanor; (5) the length and mood of the interrogation; (6) whether any limitation of movement or other form of restraint was placed on the defendant during the interrogation; (7) the officer's response to any questions asked by the defendant; (8) whether directions were given to the defendant during the interrogation; and (9) the defendant's verbal or nonverbal response to such directions. Matheny, 46 P.8d at 465-66. T 14 This list is not exhaustive, see People v. Holt, 233 P.3d 1194, 1197 (Colo.2010), and no single factor is determinative. People v. Hankins, 201 P.3d 1215, 1219 (Colo.2009) (citing People v. Minjares, 81 P.3d 348, 353 (Colo.2003)). 115 The trial court's inquiry "is limited to an objective reasonable person standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mumford v. People“'whether a reasonable person in the suspect's position would believe himself to be deprived of his freedom of action to the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mumford v. People“[wJhether an individual has been subjected to custodial interrogation in violation of Miranda is a question of law that we review de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mumford v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.