Doe v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Doe v. Phillips · Squaw Creek Drainage District v. Turney · Systematic Business Services, Inc. v. Bratten · Landmark Bank v. Ciaravino · County of Bollinger v. Ladd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he basis of equity “is the doing of complete, essential, and perfect justice between all the parties without regard to form, and its object is the prevention of injustice.” In granting equitable relief, the court should do “complete justice by enjoining the whole of the unlawful proceeding.” Here the circuit court recognized that eliminating the registration requirement only partially resolved an injustice for pre-1995 offenders. To ensure complete justice, equity required eliminating access to information obtained during the unconstitutional registration process. The injunction was proper to the extent that it prohibited the Superintendent from using photographs and identifying information that were unlawfully acquired. Id. (internal citations omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Phillips · Doe v. Merritt“We agree that the circuit court abused its discretion in extending the injunction to photographs and information the Superintendent acquired from non-SORA sources. The broad scope of relief im-permissibly interfered with the Superintendent’s lawful conduct and did nothing to protect the pre-1995 offenders from the negative consequences of the unconstitutional registration requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Phillips
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.