Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 208th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Theus v. State · Lucas v. State · Jackson v. State · Simpson v. State · Rodriguez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) General Rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from the witness or established by public record but only if the crime was a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to a party. (b) Time Limit. Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, .whichever is the later date, unless the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts and • circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.