Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 U.S. 129 - Ewert v. Bluejacket

Ewert v. Bluejacket’s Empirical Analysis

259 U.S. 129 · 1922

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 16 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably County of Oneida New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State New York (1985), United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co. (1961)

34 federal appellate · 16 district · 13 state decisions

2701922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBluejacket v. Ewert (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · Galliher v. Cadwell · United States v. Germaine · United States v. Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the equitable doctrine of laches . . . cannot properly have application to give vitality to a void deed and to bar the rights of Indian wards in lands subject to statutory restrictions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Ewert] still holds the legal title to the land.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'void and confers no right upon the wrongdoer,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.