Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Va. 708 - Arlington County v. White

Arlington County v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 151 · 26 U.S.C. § 152

Relies on Patterson v. United States · Commonwealth v. County Board of Arlington County · City of Richmond v. Board of Supervisors · City of Richmond v. Confrere Club of Richmond, Virginia, Inc. · Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. Horne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Virginia, the powers of boards of supervisors are fixed by statute and are limited to those conferred expressly or by necessary implication. . . . This rule is a corollary to Dillon’s Rule that municipal corporations have only those powers expressly granted, those necessarily or fairly implied therefrom, and those that are essential and indispensable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.