In Re Tun’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Cleaver-Bascombe · In Re Cleaver-Bascombe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“repaid to the Superior Court $16,034, which represented the 'time that Respondent had double billed minus a reasonable estimate [of the time] that he could have but failed to bill for other court-appointed matters.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Harry Tun“[i]t is professional misconduct for a lawyer to ... [e]ngage in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Harry Tun“[i]t is professional misconduct for a lawyer to ... [e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Harry Tun
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.