¶1Memorandum by the Court. The awards rest solely on proof of reproduction cost less depreciation, without any indication that either property was unique or a specialty (Guthmuller v. State of New York, 23 A D 2d 597). Determinations thus bottomed on erroneous principles of law must, of course, be rejected (Matter of Huie [Fletcher], 2 N Y 2d 168, 171). Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, and cases remanded to Special Term for remittal to a new commission for rehearing and determination, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.
26 A.D.2d 980
In re Ford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 1966
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1966-11-21
Decided 1966-11-21