¶1—Motion refused, on the authority of Ex parte Elston, 25 Ala. 72; Ex parte Small, ib. 74; Ex parte City Council of Montgomery, 24 ib. 98, and cases cited.
26 Ala. 133
Ex parte Rowland
Decided January 15, 1855
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1855-01-15
Hon. James B. Clark, presiding. The petitioner (John S'. Rowland) alleges that he filed a bill in equity, in April, 1853, against one Samuel Whitman, for the settlement of certain partnership accounts ; that after the defendant had answered, and had also filed a cross bill, a written agreement was entered into between them, “ that the said original bill, cross bill, and answer, and all the claims set up in the same, should be totally abandoned by the parties, as though they…
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1939
2 state decisions
Relies on Ex parte Elston
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1855-01-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →