¶1— The application must be overruled, on the authority of several adjudged cases.—See Ex parte Elston, 25 Ala. 72; Ex parte Small, ib. 74; Ex parte Rowland, at the present term.
26 Ala. 170
Ex parte Garlington
Decided January 15, 1855
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1855-01-15
Hon. Robert Dougherty, presiding. . .The petitioner (Joseph E. Garlington) alleges that a suit was instituted against him, in the Circuit Court of Chambers, by M. H. Gladden, endorsee of Julius O.Eckles ; that he af-terwards entered into a written agreement with the real plaintiff in said suit to submit the matters in controversy therein to arbitration; that at the succcccding term of the court he proved this fact to the court, and moved to strike said cause from the docket,…
Relies on Ex parte Elston
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1855-01-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1925
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →