Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Ala. App. 146

154 So 912

Foxx v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1934

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1934-05-15

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1978

19 state decisions

9019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RICE, Judge.

¶1 The jury’s verdict found appellant guilty under the first count of the indictment, which action operated as an acquittal of him under the second. There were but two counts in the indictment.

¶2 The first was in Code form for an offense under Code 1923, § 4131. Demurrers to it were properly overruled. Code 1923, § 4556, form 58.

¶3 If the inclusion of the second count, with the first, constituted a misjoinder of offenses rendering the indictment subject to the demurrers interposed on that ground, the action of the jury above noted caused any error in overruling said demurrers to be without injury to appellant.

¶4 The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and we can find no prejudicial error to have been committed.

¶5 The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

¶6 Affirmed.

/26/alaapp/146 · .json · Public domain