Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Ala. App. 146

154 So 821

Hankins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1934

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1934-05-15

Relies on 21 Ala. App. 261 - Miller v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2001

4 state decisions

1019341940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

¶1 Appellant was charged by indictment with assault with intent to murder P. A. Van-diver. Under an indictment of this character a conviction may be had of a simple assault or an assault and battery. Miller v. State, 21 Ala. App. 261, 107 So. 226.

¶2 The trial of this appellant in the court below resulted in his conviction for the offense of assault and battery; the jury assessed a fine against him of $100. He having failed to pay the fine and costs, the court, as the law requires, sentenced him to perform hard labor for the county. Judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper only; there is no bill of exceptions, in the absence of which no question can be considered except the regularity of the proceedings in the court below as disclosed by the record. This question has had our consideration. We discover no error apparent on the record. It is regular in all respects. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/26/alaapp/146 · .json · Public domain