Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Ala. App. 290 - Elmore v. State

26 Ala. App. 290 - Elmore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 1976
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 1976

10 state decisions

6019351940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was relevant for the state to prove the nature and character of the wound inflicted and, as tending to prove the animus of the assault, the severity of the wound and the time and medical attention necessary for it to heal. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.