Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 ARIZ 327 - Douglas v. State

Douglas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 1985

21 state decisions

401924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Alviso · Sisson v. State · State v. Scott · Lenord v. State · McCann v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * There is no fact or circumstance shown by the evidence for the state that such taking was not felonious, nor did the defendant undertake to show or suggest any. It is true a conviction cannot be sustained upon the mere confession of the accused that he took the animal, but the confession, when freely and voluntarily made, the corpus delicti being established, even though by purely circumstantial evidence, is sufficient to sustain the conviction. 25 Cyc. 120; Underhill’s Criminal Evidence (3d Ed.), p. 654; Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, vol. 2, pp. 1681 and 1813; McCann v. State, 20 Ariz. 489 , 182 P. 96 ; People v. Alviso, [ 55 Cal. 230 ], supra; Jackson v. State, 10 Okl.Cr. 525 , 139 P. 324 ; Kinzer v. State, 15 Okl.Cr. 267 , 176 P. 92 ; People v. Vedal, 28 Cal.App. 366 , 152 P. 438 ; State v. Scott, 86 Wash. 296 , 150 P. 423 , L.R.A. 1916B, 844 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.