26 Ariz. App. 118 - State v. Boniface’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2011
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steele v. United States No. 1 · 19 Ariz. App. 257 - State v. Jung · State v. Yoder · People v. Royse · 50 Ala. App. 636 - Hutto v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““On several occasions courts have upheld search warrants with incorrect street addresses, where the warrants contained not only the erroneous street address but also a written description or name of the premises to be searched. See for example, Guzman v. State, 508 S.W.2d 375 (Tex.1974); Hutto v. State, 50 Ala.App. 636 , 282 So.2d 75 (Ala.1973); State v. Gallo, 279 So.2d 71 (Fla.App. 1973); People v. Laws, 7 Ill.App.3d 826 , 288 N.E.2d 890 (1972).” State v. Boniface, 26 Ariz.App. 118, 119 , 546 P.2d 843, 844 (1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morgan“To describe the place to be searched with particularity as is required, certainly means that if the place has an established street address, and this is the only method of description utilized, the correct address, and only the correct address, will suffice. In our view, this is a self-evident constitutional requirement in those cases where search warrants utilize [only] street numbers and street names as a means of describing the place to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Finch v. State“[u]pon arriving at this address, the police officer who had prepared and filed the affidavit supporting the issuance of the search warrant determined that a mistake had been made as to the address and decided not to execute the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Finch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.