26 Ariz. App. 149 - State v. Bullock’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1980
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Griffin v. California · State v. Harvill · Carroll v. State · State v. Rodgers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““c. Inquiry by the Court. The court shall initiate the examination of jurors by identifying the parties and their counsel, briefly outlining the nature of the case, and explaining the purposes of the examination. It shall ask any questions which it thinks necessary touching the prospective jurors’ qualifications to serve in the case on trial. d. Voir Dire Examination. The court shall conduct the voir dire examination, putting to the jurors all appropriate questions requested by counsel. The court may in its discretion examine one or more jurors apart from the other jurors. If good cause appears, the court may permit counsel to examine an individual juror. e. Scope of Examination. The examination of prospective jurors shall be limited to inquires directed to bases for challenge for cause or to information to enable the parties to exercise intelligently their peremptory challenges.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.