Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Ariz. App. 490 - Wiesel v. Ashcraft

26 Ariz. App. 490 - Wiesel v. Ashcraft’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2008

17 state decisions

601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graffam v. Burgess · Daru v. Martin · Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMA · Haymes v. Rogers · McCoy v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the case of McCoy v. Brooks, 9 Ariz. 157 , 80 P. 365 (1905) the general rule in Arizona dealing with vacation of execution sales because of inadequate bids is that mere inadequacy of price, where the parties stand on an equal footing and there are no confidential relations between them, is not, in and of itself, sufficient to authorize vacation of the sale unless the inadequacy is so gross as to be proof of fraud or shocks the conscience of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The motion to set aside the sale is addressed to the sound discretion of the court but, this discretion is not unlimited. In exercising its discretion, the court must base its decision on the pertinent principles of law or equity applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the inadequacy [of price is] so great as to shock the conscience....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.