26 Ariz. App. 500 - State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Illinois v. Allen · Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner · 56 Ill. 2d 361 - People v. Pierce · Bustamante v. Eyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant shall be precluded from relief under this rule based upon any ground: (3) That has been waived at trial, on appeal, or in any previous collateral proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[I]t must be shown that the defendant had personal notice of the proceeding, that he was aware that he had a right to attend and that he had been informed that the proceeding would go forward in his absence should he fail to appear.” ( 541 P.2d at 1155 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The prosecutor shall plead and prove any ground of preclusion by a preponderance of the evidence;””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.