¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Ingraham, J., below and question certified answered in the negative.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werneb, Willabd Babtlett and Hiscook, JJ.
26 Bedell 618
81 N.E 1171
Decided May 10, 1907
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1907-05-10
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 8, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside the summons and complaint in an action of quo warranto and the service thereof as unlawful.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1907-05-10
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1987
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.