Future Time, Inc. v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Pavy v. Chastant (1989), Tavenner v. Smoot (2001)
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Thompson v. United States · 362 F. Supp. 429 - In Re Freudmann · Rice v. Matthews · In the Matter of Marcel Freudmann in Re Joseph Blankstein Trustee · In Re Harpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To hold now that there occurred no transfer of property with the intent to hinder creditors merely because the debts on the res- idence exceeded its . . . value would be to reward appellant for his wrongdoing, which this court refuses to do.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless— (2) The debtor, with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor ... has transferred ... or permitted to be transferred ... (A) property of the debtor, within one year before the date of the filing of the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.