Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 CAL 581 - Hathaway v. Brady

Hathaway v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

1864

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2010

13 state decisions

501864187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ San Francisco, August 26th, 1863. “ One day after the. entry of an order in the Supreme Court affirming judgment in the Third District Court, Alameda County, of Hathaway v. Brady, or if such judgment is not affirmed, one day after demand, without grace, we promise, for value received, to pay W. "W. Crane, at our office in San Francisco, in United States gold coin, of the present standard of fineness and value, two thousand five hundred dollars, with interest, payable in like gold coin, atone and one fourth per cent per month. “PATTERSOU & STOW.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.