Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 CAL2D 780 - People v. Lindley

People v. Lindley’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 106 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably 28 Cal. 2d 121 - People v. Valentine (1946), 98 Cal. App. 2d 1 - People v. Griffin (1950)

5 federal appellate · 106 state decisions

67019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Howard · People v. Thomas · People v. Farrington · 13 Cal. 2d 37 - People v. Green · People v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the evidence shows the defendant to be guilty of murder in the first degree, but does not show some extenuating facts or circumstances, it is the duty of the Jury to find a simple verdict of murder in the first degree, and leave with the law the responsibility of fixing the punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the responsibility of affixing the punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The law of this state provides that every person guilty of murder in the first degree shall suffer death or confinement in the state prison for life, at the discretion of the jury that finds him guilty. If you should find the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, it will be your duty to determine which of the two penalties shall be inflicted, the death penalty or confinement in the state prison for life. If you should fix the penalty as confinement in the state prison for life, you will so indicate in your verdict, using a form that will be handed to you when you retire to deliberate, but if you should fix the penalty as death, you will not specify the death penalty in the verdict and you will say nothing about punishment in the verdict. In determining which punishment shall be inflicted, you are entirely free to act according to your own judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.