26 Cal. App. 198 - Grom v. Center’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1917
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 16 Cal. App. 692 - California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co. · Nanz v. Park Co. · Donehoo v. Johnson · Gibson v. Fields
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is probably not true that under the terms of this section, a gardener or tiller of the soil could claim a lien by reason of labor expended in the general care of trees or crops, but under the contract made with Chisholm it appears that he was only to plant the seeds, trees, flowers, shrubs, etc., and to see that they were well started after being placed in the ground.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howe v. Myers““It may be said, also, that the planting of a vineyard stands on an entirely different footing from the ordinary cultivation of the soil. It may be doubted whether for the latter said section affords a lien, since that is probably not such improvement as the statute exacts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howe v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.