Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 CALAPP2D 700 - People v. Young

People v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1972
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1972

7 state decisions

4019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Yeager · Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevitt · People v. Lee Yick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On a motion for a new trial, where conflicting affidavits are filed, the question of fact is one for the determination of the trial judge and his determination will not be disturbed upon appeal if there is substantial evidence, as there was in the instant case, to sustain his finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.