Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 CALAPPSUPP4TH 1 - People v. Williams

People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2023

4 state decisions

201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler · 10 Cal. App. 4th 672 - People v. Harris · 21 Cal. App. 4th 342 - People v. Smith · 3 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 11 - People v. Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[additional sanctions are proposed in the literature (fn.25, ante ), but we have no present grounds to believe that the above procedure will be ineffective to deter such abuses of the peremptory challenge. If experience should prove otherwise, it will be time enough then to consider alternative penalties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.