Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 COLOAPP 468 - Snider v. Ostrander

Snider v. Ostrander’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1954
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Towsley · Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company · Steel v. St Louis Smelting Refining · Shepley v. Cowan · Moore v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * There is a seeming conflict of authority as to whether the cancellation of a patent can be had upon complaint made by any other than the United States government; but there seems to be no doubt as to the right of the courts, in contests between private citizens, in which the United States has no interest or has parted with the legal title to the lands in dispute, to declare the holder of such title a trustee holding the same for the use and benefit of the true and equitable owner of the lands and require a transfer of such title in the manner approved by courts of equity, * * * .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.