State v. Headley’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DiCarlantonio v. United States · Neal v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Anderson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · School Board of Nassau County, Florida, Et Al. v. Arline · United States v. Urrego-Linares
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Manzi's testimony regarding narcotics trafficking methods was related both to the specific crime charged and to the environment necessaiy to conduct a narcotics operation. Moreover, it was not cumulative of prior testimony. We, therefore, conclude that Castillo and [iUnited States v. ] Long do not control, and defer to the trial court’s broad discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.