Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 F.1d 450 - Travers v. Beyer

Travers v. Beyer’s Empirical Analysis

26 F. 450 · 1886

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
December 1901
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1901

3 federal appellate ·

80188618901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendants cannot escape liability for infringement. They are making, and putting upon the market, an article which, of necessity, to their knowledge, is to be used for the purpose of infringing the complainant’s patent. They thereby concert with those to whom they sell the blocks to invade the complainant’s rights. They are intentional promoters of the ultimate act of infringement””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.