Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 F.2d 1017

Docket Nos. 322, 323.

Bing v. Bowers

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1928.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1928-06-18

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1939

9 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bing v. Bowers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1928-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, of New York City (John W. Davis, Lewis M. Isaacs, and Blount Ralls, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

¶3Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

¶4Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Judgments affirmed, upon the opinion of Mack, J., below. 22 F.(2d) 450.

/26/f2d/1017 · .json · Public domain