In re Babcock’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.2d 153 · 1928
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1975
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 377
Relies on McClellan v. Carland · Hawes v. Oakland · Virginia v. Rives · In re Pennsylvania Co. · Pacific Coast Steamship Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is elementary that in corporate litigation the corporate stockholders are represented by the corporation, and that, in general, the stockholders or individuals or groups of them are not entitled to intervention or separate representation. Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U.S. 450 , 26 L.Ed. 827 ; Corbus v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co., 187 U.S. 455, 463 , 23 S.Ct. 157 , 47 L.Ed. 256 . * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.