Texas Co. v. Brice’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.2d 164 · 1928
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1997
7 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore Co v. Baugh · Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co. · MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. Nelson · Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Rahn · 2 Smith & H. 580 - Gulf Refining Co. v. Huffman Weakley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the principal may consent to the employment of subagents on such terms as please him, and, where he has consented only upon the express or implied condition that the subagent shall not be deemed his agent, that condition, as between the parties must control”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.