Paladini v. Flink’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.2d 21 · 1928
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1988
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart · United States v. Katz · Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. · Lynch v. Turrish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to encourage investment by exempting the investor from loss in excess of the fund he is willing to risk in the enterprise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flink v. Paladini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.