Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 F.3d 1562 - Yapp v. Reno

Yapp v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

26 F.3d 1562 · 1994

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Piamba Cortes ex rel. Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc. (1999), Pielage v. McConnell (2008)

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3181 (Extradition Treaties Interpretation Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 3184

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Doggett v. United States · United States v. Menasche · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'cannot complain if required to submit to such modes of trial ... as the laws of that country may prescribe for its own people, unless a different mode be provided for by treaty.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An international agreement is to be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to its terms in their context and in the light of its object and purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Deciding this case ... also requires us to interpret the meaning of the lapse of time provision of the 1931 Extradition Treaty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.