Singleton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.3d 233 · 1994
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 41 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Knight v. United States (1994), David v. United States (1998)
23 federal appellate · 41 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 46 U.S.C. § 12111 · 46 U.S.C. § 70505
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[I]ssues disposed of in a prior appeal will not be reviewed again by way of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“if it is 'highly probable' that the challenged action did not affect the judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“was sufficiently prejudicial to undermine confidence in the outcome of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.