United States v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.3d 490 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Sczubelek (2005), United States v. Poole (2008)
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Scott v. Rosenberg · Morel v. Morel · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the defendant released ...; (2) extend a term of supervised release ... at any time prior to the expiration or termination of the term of supervised release ...; (3) revoke a term of supervised release, and require the defendant to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised. release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in such term of supervised release without credit for time previously served on postrelease supervision, if the court, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure applicable to revocation of probation or supervised release, finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release.,..”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(c) Delayed revocation.-The power of the court to revoke a sentence of probation for violation of a condition of probation, and to impose another sentence, extends beyond the expiration of the term of probation for any period reasonably necessary for the adjudication of matters arising before its expiration if, prior to its expiration, a warrant or summons has been issued on the basis of an allegation of such a violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the district court were to lose jurisdiction upon the lapse of the term of supervised release, persons who violated the conditions of their release near the end of the supervisory period would be immune to revocation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.