Keller v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
26 F.3d 856 · 1994
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
November 2009
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · McMillian v. Schweiker · Tome v. Schweiker · Cook v. Bowen · Nettles v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing additional and significant work-related limitation of function.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of pain; (3) precipitating and aggravating factors; (4) dosage, effectiveness and side effects of medication; and (5) functional restrictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.