Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 F.3d 856 - Keller v. Shalala

Keller v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

26 F.3d 856 · 1994

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
November 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · McMillian v. Schweiker · Tome v. Schweiker · Cook v. Bowen · Nettles v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing additional and significant work-related limitation of function.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of pain; (3) precipitating and aggravating factors; (4) dosage, effectiveness and side effects of medication; and (5) functional restrictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.