Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 F.3d 95

Docket No. 93-15306.

Green v. Anderson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.

Decided April 29, 1994.

Amended June 13, 1994.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-04-29

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1999

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on 811 F. Supp. 516 - Green v. Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

¶2*96Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

¶3Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

¶6This Court’s Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words “the preliminary injunction” between “AFFIRM” and “for.”

¶7The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.

/26/f3d/95 · .json · Public domain