¶1 Travis Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hill v. Angelone, No. CA-01-121-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED.