Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 F. App'x 304

In re: Murray v.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 30, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-01-30

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Sawyer · United States of America v. Joan M. Noske

Decided 2002-01-30

PER CURIAM.

¶1 William Wise Murray, a federal inmate, petitions for a writ of error coram nobis under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651 (1994), seeking (1) vacatur of his conviction on the ground that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict him, and (2) an order to direct the district court to provide him with a copy of the trial transcript. A writ of error coram nobis is available only when the petitioner is not in custody. See, e.g., United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31, 37 (1st Cir.2001). Because Murray is in federal custody and has filed a prior motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), he may not circumvent the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), by filing this petition. United States v. Noske, 235 F.3d 405, 406 (8th Cir.2000).

¶2 Accordingly, we deny Murray leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his petition for a writ of error coram nobis, and deny his motion for injunction and bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3 PETITION DENIED.

¶4 Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

/26/fappx/304 · .json · Public domain