Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 F. App'x 362

Jones v. Conroy

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-02-11

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Francis M. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). Because no second or successive petition is permitted unless the petitioner first receives permission from this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), the district court *363 properly dismissed Jones’ habeas petition. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/26/fappx/362 · .json · Public domain