26 F. Supp. 2d 758 - Morcher v. Nash’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1333 · 48 U.S.C. § 1612
Relies on Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Sosebee v. Rath · Therrien v. Therrien · Miller v. Riegler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the amount which should in justice and reason be awarded”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.